Svmuu News Discussions surrounding Bitcoin Improvement Proposal BIP-110 continue to intensify. Bitcoin pioneer and Blockstream co-founder Adam Back retweeted, pointing out that while the proposal is described as a temporary soft fork to clean up on-chain "spam data" and curb data bloat caused by protocols like Ordinals, its design may suppress Bitcoin's future upgrade capabilities. This is because the proposal would disable the OP_SUCCESS opcode in Tapscript, which is considered a crucial reserved mechanism for future Bitcoin soft fork upgrades. Additionally, BIP-110 also limits the Taproot control block size to 257 bytes, which could impact the development of potential Layer2 technologies like BitVM that rely on extensive script execution. Although BIP-110 is positioned as a "temporary measure," Bitcoin soft fork upgrades typically require coordination cycles spanning several years. Restricting upgrade interfaces during this period could have long-term implications.